The Elder Scrolls General, aka /tesg/, is a elder scroll fansite for anyone who wants to learn about modding. Oh, and your waifu sucks.
My 970 was able to outrun my proc most of the time which is clock for clock the same as the i5 as far as the game is concerned.So maybe the 970 vs 6600k is the breaking point when comparing GPU vs CPUToday, my 980ti just sits there most of the time, theres enough headroom to use ENB without any fps dip.Im hoping that SKGE's shadow shader/engine alleviates some of the issues. Supposedly, the way skyrim's shadows works, is very unusual.EDIT: I was going to run some tests with my old system but I sold the GPU and gave away the other components.ENB without any FPS dip? Not possible because ENB does require more CPU power as well as GPU.My 970 is really struggling hard in many places such as Markarth outputting just some 30 fps with dips to 20. Without ENB it's steadily over 40. Even 1070 one is not enough for ENB heavily modded Skyrim, tbh. Nice to see you are still around CJ.
I haven't tried using the REGS version of Nernies expansion but I will see how it works with ICAIO.Like Teabag I use Inconsequential NPCs but not Interesting NPCs. The only problem I have is with the patch for Cutting Room Floor; it's fairly old and outdated. The CRF changes in the part of the mod that includes the Thalmor Headquarters aren't always compatible with the Inconsequential NPC changes there.I use two Arthmoor mods that provide expansions of existing places,. They add some immersion, there don't seem to be other mods that change these, and these sites are ones that ICAIO isn't planning to change.I haven't tested whether Understone Keep Fountains and Rubble, Better City Entrances, or Better Docks are compatible with ICAIO but I expect there would be some compatibilty problems with these.I use the Location and New Location mods in REGS except for the Sky Haven Temple mod; I instead use a different Sky Haven temple mod that was previously in REGS. Like Teabag and others I'm not using the Thirteen Oranges mods.As I mentioned in my last post, I use Inns and Taverns. I also use Frostfall, and in the northern parts of Skyrim it isn't possible to walk very far without having to stop and build a campfire.
The stops are frequent enough that walking gets quite tedious (and unrealistically often). Having a few Inns and Taverns in these areas seems more realistic and lore friendly than expecting everyone to run or use a horse, and even then spend a lot of realtime in the game managing campfires.
When the modular version of Inns and Taverns comes out I might remove more of the sites in warmer areas. Even with these northern Inns and Taverns it's is still necessary to stop fairly often and build a compfire when using Frostfall, but it seems a little more realistic to me.I use the STEP mods in the REGS Enchancement section plus Better Fast Travel, which adds some additional locations for fast travel.Most of the need for compatibility patches with REGS seem to be for lighting mods. STEP favors Relighting Skyrim and there aren't many existing patches for this with the mods in REGS. There are a few more for ELFX Exteriors (used in SR:LE), but there is still a need for lighting patches. Also when you say removing one inn, could you share how you did that? I really just want to make immersive citizens and expanded towns and cities work together.
I would like the other mods from regs, but I can live without them with the exception of ETaC. I really love that mod.A post on Sept. 12, 2016 on the Nexus page for Inns and Taverns by winterlove provides the details on this. The existing ETaC patch for Inns and Taverns eliminates the compatibility issues except for a few minor problems (which can be fixed with a small manual patch if desired).
The patch:. removes the ETaC Karthwasten inn leaving only the Inns and Taverns inn (Pick and Shovel); and. moves the inn from Inns and Taverns in Stonehills so it doesn't conflict, resulting in two inns in Stonehills.There will also be two inns in Shor's Stone, one from ETaC and one from Inns and Taverns at opposite ends of the town.Once the modular version of Inns and Taverns is available if will be fairly easy to remove one or more of these three inns from Inns and Taverns if desired. There might even be a version of the Inns and Taverns mod that does this; otherwise Mator's Merge Plugins mod can be used with the modular inns to create a single plugin for the revised Inns and Taverns. The ETaC Nexus page has an excellent detailed description on the steps for merging plugins that include navmesh (NAVM) records. I'll add a second question: Can i just remove ICAIO from STEP:extended without problems? Or do i need to edit some STEP patch?Things like ETAC or JKs Skyrim or Dawn of Skyrim are way more important to me than some uninteresting AI mod.
I can't believe STEP choose to include this mod and break all the important compatibility. /bashes head against desk/I just spend a whole week and all my free time installing STEP Extended and now i find out that i can't build on top of it. My dreams are shattered.PS: Or could i just install the Lite Version of ICAIO, without breaking the STEP Extended install? The mod description says it should be compatible w- everything.Edited by jjensson, 27 October 2016 - 07:53 PM. As I mentioned in some previous posts, most REGS mods don't seem to have any significant compatibility problems with ICAIO.
An updated version of the is now available, and it will again be evolving and maintained. For this update the guide was brought up to date and only a few mods were added or removed. There have been many changes and additions to mods relevant to REGS since the last time the guide was updated, so can we now continue the discussions on mods for the guide.I want to particularly thank CJ2311 for all the work he has done n creating and evolving the guide, and also for all the work that most of us never saw that he did in creating complex patches with the Creation Kit and helping the mod authors whose mods appeared in the REGS guide.
I was quite pleased that he recently gave me permission to update and maintain the REGS guide. Great news, REGS has always been my favorite pack. I am currently working on a SSE setup and packs for that, very much WIP. REGS has always been a great inspiration for quest/city/world mods for me so I'm very glad for this. I see you are keeping REGS compatible with ICAIO. I had personally decided to drop ICAIO to be able to use worldspace mods without issues, but seeing the mods currently on the list and that you will use ICAIO, I will add it back. How do you deal with worldspace conflicts where ICAIO and another mod edits the same object?Possible additions, artmoor's village mods?
I haven't tried them myself. Beyond Skyrim - Bruma. Again, I haven't tried it.Last question, do you have any plans on an SSE version? It nice to see a REGS update. We did try and use as much as REGS as we could that didn't heavily impact on FPS.I will just say that Apple Green was dropped from SRLE LOTD ages ago due to me not liking it all that much. However there is still a patch for CACO for it on our Nexus Page which I am happy for you to use it as you see fit I am sure Astakos wouldn't mind either (he was the original author of the patch best double check with him to make sure).Also just beware that our CR Subguide hasn't been updated since early March and is unlikely to be updated again (at least I wont. Darth wont nor Nozzer)Edited by DarkladyLexy, 07 July 2017 - 10:05 AM.
Image: MCpl Marc-Andre Gaudreault Canadian Forces Combat CamerabyCGAI FellowMay 2019Table of Contents.Executive SummaryPurchasing a fleet of fighter aircraft is a complex process with many variables and the Canadian government has a duty to ensure the billions of procurement dollars required are properly spent. The interplay between the four dimensions involved in military procurement (military, technological, economic, and political) defies simple analysis. The government has directed the Canadian Armed Forces to ensure Canadian sovereignty, defend North America, and engage in extraterritorial missions. The Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) has responded to its responsibilities to support these commitments with a thorough, capability-based Statement of Requirements for the future fighter, taking critical functionalities of operating in the future battlespace and emerging technologies into consideration.The fighters expected to be offered by the four qualified suppliers represent two significant cleavages. The first cleavage is technological/sustainability, namely between fourth- and fifth-generation fighter aircraft and revolves around long-term sustainment costs and future technological adaptability. The second cleavage is commercial/security, specifically European (Eurofighter/Gripen) versus American (F-35/Super Hornet) and enmeshes national security compliance with the government’s desire for tailorable economic packages.
Faction Pit Fighter Sse 2
The specificity of these cleavages is important to understand as they have repercussions in each of the four decision-making dimensions.The government’s choice to ensure a competitive process with more than three bidders has resulted in modifications to the assessment of mandatory criteria in critical operational functions, lowering the threshold of performance measurements identified by the RCAF. Suitability and adaptability to two- and five-eyes requirements will be a crucial operational determinant. However, application of the current Industrial and Technological Benefits policy and the measure of points awarded for the economic offset portion in the Request For Proposal appears to undermine the primacy of meeting military needs. Thus, leading to the spectre of the Liberal government’s promise that “We will not buy the F-35 stealth fighter-bomber” becoming a reality through other policy means.Canada is a North American state with responsibility to protect not only ourselves but our most important strategic partner and neighbour. To maximize effectiveness, any future fighter will need to be fully integral to the North American battlespace as opposed to simply being integrated and interoperable as is the accepted practice in NATO. The deputy minister of National Defence has stated that capability is the core component in the procurement process. Allowing economic benefits to prevail over capability during evaluation inevitably changes the empirical equation of the stated government policy that initiated the purchase in the first place.
A fair and balanced competition for the future fighter, uninhibited by overt political interference, needs to occur to ensure the right fighter aircraft is chosen.IntroductionThe release of the auditor general of Canada’s report1 in November 2018 provided independent confirmation that Canada’s fighter force is in trouble and further evidence of political mismanagement as the root cause. There is plenty of bipartisan blame to go around regarding political gamesmanship on the fighter replacement file. However, the report highlighted the Department of National Defence’s (DND) due diligence in identifying that personnel shortage problems were the most critical aspect of closing the government’s “capability gap” narrative, not the purchase of interim fighters. Importantly, the report raises the unanswered question of why the government chose to ignore this professional military advice and fabricate a security crisis to pursue a sole-source purchase of additional aircraft.
Misrepresenting the facts and manipulating the procurement process have only damaged the government’s integrity and credibility, for they lead to the conclusion, as one national paper stated, that “incompetence is now layered atop mismanagement to such an extent that it’s almost breathtaking to behold.”2Purchasing a fleet of fighter aircraft is a complex process with many variables and the government has a duty to ensure the billions of dollars required are properly spent. Unfortunately, has led to significant misinformation and distortion of the factors surrounding this essential capital procurement. Conflation of idiosyncratic design features, such as stealth and one versus two engines, into critical determinates undermines public understanding of the four dimensions that constitute military procurement decision-making – political, military, technological and economic/commercial.
Pit Fighter Trailer
To avoid having to address the many inaccuracies embedded in the various narratives, this paper will explore the future fighter requirement from an evidence-based framework. It is not intended to be an all-encompassing and exhaustive analysis, but to highlight the interconnected, multifaceted nature of the task and to identify many of the competing factors that are involved.RequirementThe release of the Canadian government’s 2017 Strong, Secure, Engaged: Canada’s Defence Policy (SSE) statement reaffirmed that the Canadian Armed Forces’ (CAF) principal roles are ensuring Canadian sovereignty, the defence of North America, and contributions to international peace and security as determined by government. These three traditional pillars3 have been the foundation of Canadian defence policy since they were introduced in the 1971 white paper on defence.